^{page 396 note 1} Metrical fragments show that the first ι was long, as in Ἀρτεμῑσ⋯α Ar. Thesm. 1200: Liddell Scott go out of their way to put a short mark over it, and also over ⋯ρτεμισ⋯α.

^{page 397 note 1} See p. 782 d (iv. p. 217 Schweighaeuser, iii. p. 20 Kaibel) which quotes Cratinus and continues schol. Ar. Pax. 1244, Ἀγκ⋯λη in Hesych. and Bekk. Anecd. 337.

^{page 398 note 1} This interpretation was wrong; see Schmidt Hesych. i. p. 23, Meineke Com. ii. p. 180.

^{page 398 note 2} Anacr. fr. 53 possibly sound, like Sophocles' .

^{page 398 note 3} The ( Critias in Ath. 600 e) struck the head of the Ζ⋯νης: Soph. fr. 494, 3 . In Aesch. Cho. 288 we find , where the sense is certainly , which occurs in Lycophron 436. Since Lycophron's verse is , it really looks possible that the phrases may somehow have exchanged places. But cf. Lycophr. 981.

^{page 398 note 4} Hesych. has also ⋯γκ⋯λως: ⋯ποτ⋯μως. These are terms in stylistic criticism; but they mean different things. It is perhaps merely a slip that has put one as an interpretation of the other: I do not venture to suggest ⋯γκ⋯λας: ⋯ποτομ⋯ς from Eur. Or. 1476.

^{page 398 note 5} Or τομ⋯δων: either would do. In Aeneas Tact. 24 there is a v.l. ⋯κτομ⋯δα: see Orelli p. 204. Hesych. gives .