No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 February 2009
page 165 note 1 The Aeolic accentuation of the dative of the article seems to have been τώ (cf. Sappho, fr. 26 (Lobel) τωιϒάμβρωι), and Gow gives τώ πόδι at 30. 3. When, however, the article is used demonstratively, as at 29. 11, 17; 30. 18, 21, Gow has τω^. One wonders with what authority.
page 167 note 1 I take the opportunity of apologizing for my ignorance as displayed in C.Q. xxi. 204, where I made the same suggestion not knowing that I had been anticipated by Briggs.