Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:07:44.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sophocles' Antigone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

H. A. S.
Affiliation:
New College, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 212 note 1 The question has naturally been frequently discussed; I should like to refer not only to the usual commentaries (I made use of Nauck, Ew. Bruhn, G. Wolff, and Jebb), but also to the small discussion between Nake, and Gringmuth, , in Neue Jahrb. 1894, pp. 260, 602 and 819Google Scholar. Jebb acknowledges frankly that he cannot solve the problem; Nake saw that the second visit of Antigone has no apparent motive. Others suggest the frightening away of wild beasts, and other such explanations.

page 231 note 1 For sacrifice at burial see Rohde, , Psyche 2, p. 231Google Scholar. Sophocles had to take care that the ceremony performed by Antigone should bear the closest possible resemblance to a regular burial.

page 214 note 1 Apollodorus does not say how Antigone was discovered; but he implies that it was not at the burial itself.

page 215 note 1 In Pausanias and Philostratus we are given to understand that Polyneices was burned (on the same pyre as Eteocles). In Sophocles there is no reference to the burning of Eteocles (e.g. Ant. 24 f. 27 f. 196, 203 f. 9O0ff.). That is probably part of the older tradition which is found in Apollodorus.