Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:48:26.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Vicissitudes of Eth. Nic. IV. 8, 6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

C. M. Mulvany
Affiliation:
Queen's College, Benares.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 51 note 1 Rhet. III. 18, 7, 1419b 5; cf. I. 11, 29, 1372a 1.

page 51 note 2 Cf. (Anon, at end of Christ's Poetics).

page 53 note 1 A little earlier (vv. 20−2) Aspasius says of the that he . Is all this about the gods out of his own head? Or did he find as a variant for in 1128a 35 and explain both readings? We seem to have the-same phenomenon, i.e. explanation of two variants, p. 114, 4 (E.N. IV. 3, 27, 1124b 24−6): . Evidently he found instead of, or as a variant beside, .

page 53 note 2 Contrast with Aristotle's condemnation of the Old Comedy for , Marc. Aur. XI. .

page 54 note 1 Cf. Rickaby, , Aquinas Ethicus II. 376Google Scholar. It is pleasant to observe that Amasis' simile of the bow (Hdt. II. 173) had been transferred, a little altered, in collationibus patrum to St. John the Evangelist; unde beatus Joannes subintulit quod similiter animus hominis frangeretur si nunquam a sua intentione relaxaretur. In this Article are six references to Cicero, viz. one to de Invent. I. 17, 25, and five to de Off. I. §§ 103.40.