No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 51 note 1 Rhet. III. 18, 7, 1419b 5; cf. I. 11, 29, 1372a 1.
page 51 note 2 Cf.
(Anon, 
at end of Christ's Poetics).
page 53 note 1 A little earlier (vv. 20−2) Aspasius says of the 
that he 
. Is all this about the gods out of his own head? Or did he find 
as a variant for 
in 1128a 35 and explain both readings? We seem to have the-same phenomenon, i.e. explanation of two variants, p. 114, 4 (E.N. IV. 3, 27, 1124b 24−6): 
. Evidently he found 
instead of, or as a variant beside, 
.
page 53 note 2 Contrast with Aristotle's condemnation of the Old Comedy for 
, Marc. Aur. XI. 
.
page 54 note 1 Cf. Rickaby, , Aquinas Ethicus II. 376Google Scholar. It is pleasant to observe that Amasis' simile of the bow (Hdt. II. 173) had been transferred, a little altered, in collationibus patrum to St. John the Evangelist; unde beatus Joannes subintulit quod similiter animus hominis frangeretur si nunquam a sua intentione relaxaretur. In this Article are six references to Cicero, viz. one to de Invent. I. 17, 25, and five to de Off. I. §§ 103.40.