Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:34:03.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Remote Deliberative’ and the ‘Prospective Subjunctive and Optative.’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. A. Sonnenschein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1-2 , February 1894 , pp. 28 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1894

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 28 note 1 I would add a pretty example from Ovid. Fast, iv. 387

Ante tamen quam summa dies spectacula sistat Ensifer Orion aequora mersus erit.

page 29 note 1 Are we not in danger of exaggerating the differences between the various kinds of subordinate classes, under the influence of the classifications current in our grammars ?—Still I should be very glad if anyone would direct my attention to a really representative collection of subordinate clauses introduced by Relatives of Place.

page 29 note 2 e.g. cases like ; Eur. Ale. 52 (cf. 113—117), where the Optat. stands in present time. These seem to come from Direct Deliberative Questions like πο τις φύγοι; quo fugiat ? (not quo fugeret ?)