Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:29:48.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reappraisal of Theophrastus - Peter Steinmetz: Die Physik des Theophrastos von Eresos. Pp. 376. Bad Homburg: Dr. Max Gehlen, 1964. Paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

James Longrigg
Affiliation:
Warburg Institute, London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Although Aristotle at de Gen. et Corr. 326b6–28 severely criticizes the hypothesis that the agent acts by penetration of the pores of the patient and regards the assumption of pores in this connexion, whether ‘empty’ (κενο⋯) or ‘full’ (πεπληρωμ⋯νοι) as περ⋯εργον, ψε⋯δος, and γελοῖον, he nevertheless recognizes that pores in another sense must be reckoned with and endeavours to harmonize this concept with his physics generally (cf. G.C. 326b34). Furthermore, in the Posterior Analytics (94b28) Aristotle makes use of the theory of pores to explain the propagation of light. The theory is not his own, but the fact that he is willing to set it up here as a working hypothesis suggests that in this connexion he did not regard it at all as γελοῖον or περ⋯εργον.