Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T23:50:56.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Propertius i. 18 and Callimachus, Acontius and Cydippe2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Francis Cairns
Francis Cairns
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1969 , pp. 131 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 131 note 3 Day, The Origins of Roman Elegy, chapter I, summarizes the reasons for this conclusion.

page 132 note 1 See Pfeiffer, ad locc.

page 132 note 2 Since writing this piece, I have noticed an adumbration of some of its contents in Jacoby, , Kleine Schriften ii, pp. 81 f.Google Scholar But Jacoby (p. 82 n. 47) declined to illustrate and demonstrate his position and it has not been observed by editors of Propertius.

page 133 note 1 For further arguments against Enk's reading see Smythe, , C.Q. xliii (1949), PP. 121 f.Google Scholar

page 134 note 1 The author of [Ovid] Her. 20 also gives a legal turn to his Acontius-Cydippe poem. Cf. also Smythe (loc. cit.) for legal material in Propertius i. 8.