^{page 304 note 1} Quaestionum Aristotelearum Criticarum et Exegeticarum Pars ii. (Gryphiswaldiae, mdccoxoiii).

^{page 305 note 1} See my edition of the Politics, Vol. II. p. lvi. sq. I may here correct my comment (p. lvii.) on 1339 a 29, where I have now little doubt that P¹ are right in reading γε: for ⋯λλ⋯ μ⋯ν οὐδ⋯ ‥ γε compare I284 b 30 and 1331 a 7. Since I observed this parallel, I see that Eucken (De Partic. Usu p. 15) had already called attention to it.

^{page 305 note 2} Ibid. p. lvii.: see also critical notes on 1255 b 12 and 1263 a 12.

^{page 306 note 1} If we ought to Presume that Γ Probably agreed with M^s P¹ when its reading is uncertain—and this, do not mistake, is Prof. Susemihl's opinion (see paper, page v., note 17)—then these 12 passages have to be counted on the side of II². I am content however, to leave them uncounted.

^{page 308 note 1} In 1271 b 37 II¹have το⋯ περ⋯ Tρι⋯πιον τ⋯που κα⋯ ‘P⋯δου: II² have ‘P⋯δον in place of ‘P⋯δου. II¹ may be right, yet an original ‘P⋯δον might easily become ‘P⋯δου, looking to the tendency of copyists to place adjacent words in the same case. The same thing holds as to number in 1273 b 41.