Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:49:06.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Principal Peterson's Indebtedness to Professor Frieze: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1893

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 136 note 1 The following sentences are quoted from Professor Frieze's Prefaces. ‘Whatever merit the present edition may possess, either iu the text or the notes, is chiefly due to the labors of those German scholars, who have for so many years devoted themselves to the clearing up of doubtful points, both in the text and in the interpretation of this author...... These eminent scholars, gathering up and by their own researches greatly enriching all that had been previously accomplished, have left little further to be desired in the elucidation of Quintilian’ (1865). In the interval between 1865 and 1888 Professor Frieze seems to know of nothing except Halm's new text and Krüger's second edition, to the latter of which he refers in these words: ‘Much assistance has also been derived, in the preparation of the notes of the tenth book, from the excellent and scholarly edition of Krüger’(1888).

page 139 note 1 Altera est divisio, quae in trcs partes et ipsa discedit (‘it is itself divided into three genera) qua, discerni posse etiam recte dicendi genera inter se videntur. Namque unum subtile, quod ἰσχν⋯ν vocant, alterum grande atque robustum, quod ⋯σχν⋯ν dicunt, constituunt, tertium alii medium ex duobus alii floridum (namque id ⋯νθηρ⋯ν appellant) addiderunt (xii. 10, 58).