No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Principal Peterson's Indebtedness to Professor Frieze: A Reply
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1893
References
page 136 note 1 The following sentences are quoted from Professor Frieze's Prefaces. ‘Whatever merit the present edition may possess, either iu the text or the notes, is chiefly due to the labors of those German scholars, who have for so many years devoted themselves to the clearing up of doubtful points, both in the text and in the interpretation of this author...... These eminent scholars, gathering up and by their own researches greatly enriching all that had been previously accomplished, have left little further to be desired in the elucidation of Quintilian’ (1865). In the interval between 1865 and 1888 Professor Frieze seems to know of nothing except Halm's new text and Krüger's second edition, to the latter of which he refers in these words: ‘Much assistance has also been derived, in the preparation of the notes of the tenth book, from the excellent and scholarly edition of Krüger’(1888).
page 139 note 1 Altera est divisio, quae in trcs partes et ipsa discedit (‘it is itself divided into three genera) qua, discerni posse etiam recte dicendi genera inter se videntur. Namque unum subtile, quod ἰσχν⋯ν vocant, alterum grande atque robustum, quod ⋯σχν⋯ν dicunt, constituunt, tertium alii medium ex duobus alii floridum (namque id ⋯νθηρ⋯ν appellant) addiderunt (xii. 10, 58).