Article contents
Abstract
- Type
- Original Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1905
References
1 Surely the conjecture in Amph. 1042, me agam for me ducam, hardly deserves a place (p. 1372) in the Thesaurus.
2 Priscian (vol. i. p. 392 H.) ascribes to the ‘vetustissimi’ the use of ludifico for ludificor. On ludificatus sum see the (defective) passage in Nonius (p. 476 Me.).
- 1
- Cited by