Article contents
Abstract
- Type
- Original Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1905
References
1 I assume that ‘om.’ has been dropped by accident in Bekker's note. Otherwise it has no meaning.
2 So in the fragment of Oenomaus preserved by Eusebius (P.E. 211 c) Croesus is called Λνδ⋯ς more than once. It is true that he has already been mentioned by name.
- 2
- Cited by