Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:30:19.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paul Gautier: Michaelis Pselli theologica, Vol. I. (Bibl. Teubneriana.) Pp. xix + 499. Leipzig: Teubner, 1989. DM 150. - D. J. O'Meara: Michaelis Pselli philosophica minora, Vol. II: opuscula psychologica, theologica, daemonologica. (Bibl. Teubneriana.) Pp. xxxiv + 233. Leipzig: Teubner, 1989. DM 82.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2009

J. A. Munitiz
J. A. Munitiz
Affiliation:
Campion Hall, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , April 1991 , pp. 229 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The first volume of the Philosophica minora, edd. J. M. Duffy and D. J. O'Meara, has been prepared but not yet published; it is not clear if a second volume of the Theologica is planned.

1 E.g. his recent study, Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity (OUP 1989), an indispensable complement to the present edition in assessing the philosophical transmission work of Psellus.

3 (Ed.) Lackner, W., Nikephoros Blemmydes: Gegen die Vorherbestimmung des Todesstunde (= Corpus Philosophorum Medii Aevi, 2), Athenian Academy, Athens and E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1985, pp. lvii–lix.Google Scholar

4 The proof correcting has been very well done: the misprints are minimal, e.g. in the Philosophica, p. 156, line 28, add a rho to read ⋯⋯ριστον. However, the Index Verborum in the Theologica volume is incomplete (e.g. ⋯σθ⋯νεια 11, 62; ⋯ντωνυμασ⋯α 30, 44; ⋯ντ⋯τυπος 45, 17, 34), and in the Philosophica (i) there is no need to correct Μωσ⋯ως to Μωυσ⋯ως (p. 130, 27, the second form is given only in the 14th cent. Vat. gr. 1026), given that both forms occur in the Theologica; and (ii) the omission of the diaeresis mark over the iota in words like ⋯ïδι⋯της is a little confusing.

5 Cf. Bulletin of British Byzantine Studies 16, 1990, p. 21 for an all too brief summary.Google Scholar

6 A sample is to be found in Gonimos, Neoplatonic and Byzantine Studies presented to Leendert G. Westerink at 75, Arethusa, Buffalo, New York, 1988, pp. 189–205 (= K. Snipes, ‘An Unedited Treatise of Michael Psellos on the Iconography of the Angels and on the Religious Festivals Celebrated on each day of the Week’).