^{page 156 note 1} See the Proceedings of the Association for that year, pp. 27–30.

^{page 157 note 1} It was a pleasure to find that Prof. Smith, of Harvard University, in his edition of the Odes and Epodes, published in the fall of 1894, took the qua clauses with dicar. Prof. Shorey (1899) takes the clauses with princeps…deduxisse, but he continues thus: ‘but it is virtually the same thing to be remembered as a poet in his humble birthplace and to be remembered as one who in or from that humble place attained the poet's fame.’ Prof. Moore (1902) makes the following comment, all too brief: ‘qua, &c. : i.e. “I shall be honoured in the district where I was born.”’ Lucian Mueller, in his monumental commentary (1900), still holds that the passage is corrupt or that there is a lacuna.

^{page 157 note 2} On points 2 and 3 see further the paper referred to above. Cf. too, to some extent, Lucian Mueller ad loc.

^{page 157 note 3} Mueller needlessly inserts quot, and, of course, punctuates differently.