Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:37:56.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Odyssey—A Reply to the Critics - Giacomo Bona: Studi sull'Odissea. Pp. xiv + 246. Turin: Giappichelli, 1966. Paper, L. 3,200.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

M. M. Willcock
M. M. Willcock
Affiliation:
University of Lancaster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1968 , pp. 25 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, he takes several pages to argue that Polyphemus was not king of the Cyclopes, only the most powerful, in order to counter Page's genial comment on ix. 70–1: ‘There is a whole community of them and Polyphemus is their lord and master; when he cries out in the night it is very natural that his loyal and sympathetic subjects should emerge in their nightgowns to ask if he is in pain.’