No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 So A. Thierfelder (in a letter to the author), referring to Ulp. Dig. 47, 10, 5, 5: fundum … qui domino colebatur.
2 -que … -que, otherwise not used in Plautus in the senarius, would not be impossible in a prologue: see Fraenkel, , Plautinisches im Plautus, p. 210Google Scholar; Haffter, , Untersuch. z. altlat. Dichtersprache, p. 119Google Scholar. Yet here, as Mr. W. L. Lorimer kindly reminds me, the occurrence of pater avosque in v. 22 speaks rather against it.
3 See Skutsch, F., Forschungen, p. 44.Google Scholar