^{page 146 note 1} Is not the puzzling expression in Soph. Phil. 300 to be corrected in the same way by substituting ὡςas for κα I cannot indeed produce any exact parallel to φρε, ὡς μθῃς: but, if Plato could use the unusual phrase φρε, ν (Crat. 430 A Rep. 453 E Cf. Dion Chrys. 13.29 φρε, ἂν…διαλγωμαι. Dion has also occasionally, e.g. 81, 93 and 163, φρε εἰπεῖν, say, let us say), there would seem to be nothing against the possibility of φρεὡς, its in a poet. Perhaps the line would be best written with something less than a full stop at μθῃς, and we may supply, if we like, let me tell you.