Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:16:44.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Augustan Pentameter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

M. L. Clarke
M. L. Clarke
Affiliation:
University College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 61 , Issue 3-4 , December 1947 , pp. 86 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The figure for the Heroides is 10–5 per cent.

2 In the Heroides, where the subject-matter is such as to invite the use of such names, the figure is 9 per cent. Four-syllable names with -que added are not included in these figures.

3 Tibullus is also much addicted to foursyllable words with -que added in this part of the pentameter. Such words are found in 337 per cent. of the pentameters of the type under consideration; corresponding figures are: Propertius, 3–6 per cent.; Ovid, Amores, 17–8 per cent.; Tristia, 32–2 per cent, (figures include the few words with -ve added).

4 It should be said that in pentameter endings of Plessis's type E (mars adoperta caput), for which Tibullus shows no particular predilection, the proportion of perfect infinitives is also high. The figure, 28 per cent., is, however, noticeably lower than that for type C.