No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 In the text Theb. 1002–3 have been accidentally inverted: Pers. 1035 read, presumably, ⋯κολύθη for ⋯κολούσθη. In the notes, at Pers. 111 the mss. are not quoted, though they differ from the text: Pers. 63n. read ‘ Herm. 17’ (not 27); Ag. 527n. read ‘Pers. 811’ (not 511); ‘paragraphus’ has slipped into the masculine in some half-dozen places (Suppl. 336. 507, 741! Theb. 407, 875; Cho. 780). There are several other less troublesome misprints.