^{page 97 note 1} Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Part X., 1914, see C.R., May, 1914.

^{page 97 note 2} If a certain German restorer of the Berlin Alcaeus could see a tracing of his restoration he would be the first to admit the cogency of my argument. The line of his initial letters is like a flight of tumble-down steps.

^{page 98 note 1} And Papiri della Soc. ital. i. 123Google Scholar, where the fragment is slightly wider but extends only to 1. 10 1–10 So Wilamowitz loc. cit., but; παρ⋯στα for παρε⋯η, πρ⋯τοι for λ⋯τοι, γ⋯ρ Ἂρευος ἔργον for Tροΐας ⋯λεθρον, and ⋯δον τ⋯λεσσαι for 18 P ηραν with ι wrongly inserted after η 20 P ραπ ι

^{page 98 note 2} The ι of the Papyrus was added, I take it, wrongly but plausibly. Veitch even gives as regular for Herodotus. For the Atticisation of ā see below.

^{page 100 note 1} See C.R. June, August, 1909.

^{page 102 note 1} See C.R. December, 1909.