Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:36:57.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Negleoted use of the Latin Subjunctive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

H. C. Elmer
H. C. Elmer
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , May 1898 , pp. 199 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1898

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 200 note 1 Since the above was written, Delbrülck (Vergleichende Syntax, II. p. 389) has accepted my conelusions reached in ‘The Latin Prohibitive’, that questions of obligation or propriety, e.g. cur ego non laeter? hunc ego non diligam ? represent a development from the Indo-European optative, and are therefore not connected with the volitive subjunctive, as has been supposed.

page 202 note 1 For another possible interpretation, see note on this passage in my edition of the Phormio.