Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:20:27.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammatum Libri. Mit erklärenden Anmerhungen vonLudwig Friedländer, Professor in Königsberg. Leipzig, S. Hirzel. vol. i pp. (4) and 523, vol. ii pp. 546. 18 M.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1887

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 54 note 1 At v. 71 by a slip of the pen ‘The Chorus are’ is written for ‘The Stranger is.’ A propos of this, is not the ΞHENOΣ of the traditional dramatis personae a singularly unhappy description ? Oedipus addresses him of course by ὦ ξνε, but I can scarcely believe that Sophocles meant him to be so described. Could Antigone when she sees him approaching (v. 29) possibly have said πλας γρ ξνον τνδε νῷν ρ instead of ἄνδρα ? Yet to describe him as ξνος in the dramatis personae is much the same thing. The word is essentially relative, and has no meaning as an independent description. ’ Aνρ Κολωνιτης would be the proper phrase. Polynices at his approach (υ. 1249) is desciibed as ξνος, but naturally, as he is known to be such, ἔμπολιν οὐκ ντα συγγεν δ υ. 1156.