No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 404 note 1 The passage in Seanrus was first pointed out by Sittl in his Lokale Verschiedenheit der lat. Sprache. Mr. Lindsay only mentions him as giving ‘a full list of examples of omissions of vowels,’ without any hint that he had given the explanation.
page 407 note 2 The fact is, I believe, that h for f (= bh) is Faliscan, and f for h (= dh, gh) is Sabine.