^{page 298 note 1} Guhl u. Kohner, Leben d. Griechen u Rmer, p. 200.

^{page 298 note 2} Mason, Woman's Share in Primitive Culture, p. 101.

^{page 298 note 3} I cite from the American Journal of Philology xvii. 180 the following footnote of Mr. L. Horton-Smith as a recent utterance of the prevailing phonetic school: vnus cannot come from the form ^*vac-nus as suggested by King and Cooksonvacnus must have yielded vagnus, cf. ilignus: ilex, salignus : salix, dignus from ^*dic-nus.

^{page 298 note 4} Cf. the author, Proceedings Am. Phil. Assoc. Special Session 1894, liii. In the list there given I propose the following new and, I believe, indubitable cognations, segnis lazy : sagna fatling (cf, pinguis fat : piger lazy), signum mark statue: secare cut, carve, lignum firewood : ligare bind up, cf. al faggots : bind.

^{page 298 note 5} Cf. the author, Am. Jr. Phil. xvii. 24 sq., and add Ov. Trist. I. iii. 11, Iovis ignibus ictus.

^{page 299 note 1} In Iwan Mller's Handbuch ², ii. 65, 2.

^{page 299 note 2} Grundriss i. 506.

^{page 299 note 3} Am. Jour. Phil. xvii. 180.

^{page 299 note 4} Proc. Am. Phil. Assoc. 1895, lxiv.

^{page 299 note 5} Proc. Am. Phil. Assoc. Special Session 1894, lii.

^{page 299 note 6} From Pedersen, Kuhn's Zeitschrift 32, 253.

^{page 299 note 7} Cf. Brugmann, Gr. i. 344 sq., Bechtel, Hauptprobleme 377 sq., Noreen, Urgerm. Lautlehre, 199. I note that the vomer- group just discussed with a velar (^*vohg-) is certainly cognate to the root of veho ride with a palatal (^*vegh-).

^{page 299 note 8} Grundriss d. Iran. Philologie i. 22.

^{page 299 note 9} The semivowels and are very widely interchangeable in Sanskrit, both in roots and in suffixes, and even in prefixes; there are few roots containing (sic) which do not show also forms with ; words written with the one letter are found in other texts, or in other parts of the same text, written with the other. Whitney Sk. Gr. ^* 53 b.