Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:03:36.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homeric Haplologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

J. B. Hainsworth
Affiliation:
King's College, London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 127 note 1 In transmitted verse the opposite error might arise, and the metrical ignorance of editors or copyists transform a haplology into bad metre but satisfactory sense. I do not know of any example, however, unless Lucilius 123, †inde Diciarchitum† (on which see Skutsch, F., Glotta, ii [1910], 370), be one.Google Scholar

page 127 note 2 Noted by Schwyzer, , I.G. Forsch. xxiv (1903), 2427, and generally accepted.Google Scholar

page 127 note 3 Wackernagel, , I.G. Forsch. xxxi (1912), 257258.Google Scholar

page 127 note 4 Id., Sprachliche Untersuchungen, 50.

page 128 note 1 Chantraine, , Grammaire Homérique, ii. 167.Google Scholar

page 128 note 2 Cf. Hesychius π⋯ρσαντες (Od. v. 107). ⋯λ⋯σαντες, πορθ⋯σαντες. ⋯νελ⋯ντες Il. i. 125 is the only Homeric passage where ⋯κπ⋯ρθειν has the goods and not the town for object.

page 128 note 3 In post-epic literature Schwyzer, , Griechische Grammatik, p. 264Google Scholar, notes only Euripides, Orestes 502, and Apollonius iv. 945, as possible examples. Boiling, op. cit., supposes that the Apollonian instance is imitative of Homer.

page 128 note 4 Bowra, C. M., Heroic Poetry (1952), 240241.Google Scholar

page 128 note 5 Lord, A. B., T.A.P.A. lxxxiv (1953), 124134.Google Scholar

page 128 note 6 Kirk, G. S., C.Q. lxiii (1960), 271281CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Kirk's paper is a valuable and timely reappraisal of the analogical arguments drawn from the South Slavic oral epic tradition; cf. now his Songs of Homer, pp. 91–95.