No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
1 See my Eleusis und die orphische Dichtung Athens, Berlin/New York, 1974.Google Scholar
2 One bad mistake may be pointed out in 4 A 18, and a questionable translation in 4 A 24.
3 ‘Mangel an historischem Sinn ist der Erbfehler aller Philosophen’, says Nietzsche, Menschliches Allzumenschliches 1.1.12.
4 See the account of Zuntz, G., Persephone (Oxford, 1971), pp. 288–289Google Scholar, and the surprising conclusions of Burkert, W., Magna Graecia 10: 1/2 (1975), 5/7.Google Scholar
5 ‘una maggiore o minore presunzione di antichità sapienziale’ (p. 10).
6 In Harrison, J. E., Themis (Cambridge2, 1927), pp. 342 f.Google Scholar
7 Partly published in Deltion 19 (1964), 17–25Google Scholar. ZPE 1 (1967), 21–32Google Scholar. To be exact, C. mentions the papyrus once, in the apparatus of 4 A 71 (!).
8 Henrichs, A., GRBS 13 (1972), 67–98Google Scholar; the new text is Phil. piet. 963.
9 Id., Cron. Erc. 5 (1975), 35Google Scholar: hitherto, the earliest reference was K.frg.70 (? third cent. A.D.). Even earlier is a fifth-century (?) graffito from Olbia, Vest. Drev. 1st. 1978: 1. 87 f., brought to my knowledge by W. Burkert: it is scratched into a plaque of bone, of enigmatic use: could it be the token of a religious community?