^{page 24 note 1} For the other contents of this volume see p. 23.—EDD.

^{page 25 note 1} Presumably from 1. 67, where for Γυλλ Stobaeus has γὑ.

^{page 25 note 2} Nor, I think, the philological basis of the note on p. xxii.

^{page 25 note 3} For καης = ‘priest’ cf. Am. Journ. Arch. 1913, 362 and Sardis vi. 2 Index iii. 25. references which I owe to Mr. W. H. Buckler.

^{page 25 note 4} So also ap. Sardis I.c.

^{page 25 note 5} Beginning with the Headlam-Knox edition, his share in which is rather obscured in this book.

^{page 26 note 1} Cf. also Phil. Woch. 1926. 77.

^{page 26 note 2} Though some may prefer a comma after ργγης ‘But as to what works he is master of,’ etc.

^{page 26 note 3} Cf. C.Q. 1925. 136; Herzog's ἒχεις is not in the Papyrus.

^{page 26 note 4} Soph. Phil. 300 was unparalleled (except for an Elean inscription) till a recent ‘newfind.’

^{page 26 note 5} And small blame to him, having published; would that all scholars found their dead selves such handy stepping-stones! Cf. C.R. 1925. 13 and Headlam-Knox text and addenda.

^{page 26 note 6} Read also by Herzog.

^{page 26 note 7} And in C.Q., I.c.

^{page 27 note 1} Three out of four of these misaccentuations are legacies from the Headlam-Knox edition.

^{page 28 note 1} This reviewer ‘restored’ 11. 1–8 in Cambridge Review, 1926. 327.

^{page 28 note 2} Collectanea Alexandrina, p. 235.