No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 121 note 1 64 31 optato finitas is no example: see Mr Ellis's editions of 1866 and 1867.
page 121 note 2 The following conjectures should have been assigned to their authors: 31 5 Thuniam atque Bithunos Schwabe, 55 9 usque Munro, 62 92 tuos Usener 65 5 Lethaeo in Parthenius.
page 122 note 1 Their succinctness however does not degenerate into Sallustianism. 45 7 text caesio, note ‘cesio G O E Ven’; 66 8 text cesariem, note ‘cesariem G O B La' Ven’; 44 7 ‘exspui scripsi, expui Scaliger’; 62 8 ‘exsiluere scripsi, exil. codd.’; 63 37 ‘languore scripsi, langore codd. quod retinnit Lachm.’ (of course languore and exsiluere and exspui are all much older than Mr Ellis, but that is not the present point); 95 9 ‘monimenta scripsi, monum. Ω.’