Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:42:49.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Electras - Armin Vögler: Vergleichende Studien zur sophokleischen und euripideischen Elektra. (Bibl. der Kl. Altertumswiss., 19.) Pp. 194. Heidelberg: Winter, 1967. Paper, DM.26.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Hugh Lloyd-Jones
Affiliation:
Christ Church, Oxford

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 36 note 1 Incidentally the Dioscuri with their not unknown Spartan connections would be strange gods for an Athenian poet to invoke on that occasion.

page 37 note 1 Nor am I convinced by Newiger's, ingenious argument (Hermes, lxxxix [1961], 422 f.Google Scholar) that the Aristophanic passage cannot be explained without supposing that Euripides' Electra is referred to.

page 37 note 2 Neither does the dissertation of Schwinge, E. R. (Hypomnemata 1, 1962Google Scholar, reviewed together with Mattheissen by Newiger, in G.G.A. 219 [1967], 175 f.Google Scholar). Schwinge tries to show that the Trachiniae is earlier than the Alcestis by an argument that involves the acceptance of an interpretation of the latter by Von Fritz (Antike und moderne Tragödie, 256 f.) that is anything but certain; see Miss Dale's introduction to her edition and Leskv. Ges. Schr. 281 f.