Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:12:53.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diounsis, Guardian of the Dithrera, and Dionysos Dithyrambos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 161 note 1 Cf. also Athenaeus XIV. 626a.

page 161 note 2 This article was printed before the appearance of Mr. Pickard-Cambridge's Dithyramb, Tragedy and Comedy. To have reduced so acute and so stern a critic of ‘origin theories’ to suspension of judgment (pp. 16, 419) is no small feat. His outstanding objections are, I think, three: (1) The difficulty of deriving δῑθραμβος from a Phrygian word διθρερα, which must correspond morphologically to a Greek *δῐθυρα. I must apologise for not having pointed out earlier that in the rude verse in which it occurs διθρερα must be scanned as a dactyl. (2) The difficulty that Dionysus had no association with grave ritual in Greece. This raises a larger question than can be discussed here. Let two sentences suffice: Assuming, as the absence of his name from the Boghaz Köi records makes probable, that D. was originally a Thrako-Phrygian (vegetation) deity, his association with grave ritual was inevitable in Anatolia, but not in Greece. Assuming, on the other hand, that D. was originally a local version of the Anatolian Peasant-god, he had as little need to appear in Greece with all his Anatolian attributes as, e.g., the Anatolian Artemis. (3) The lateness of the evidence. This objection is, I hope, met below.

page 162 note 1 Οὐρανς has no ‘etymology,’ and may be an Anatolian loan-word. Ουρανιος may quite well be Phrygian (Fraser).

page 162 note 2 Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, VIII., 1924, P. 352.Google Scholar

page 162 note 3 Journal of the Manchester E. and O. Soc., No. XI., 1924, p. 23.Google Scholar

page 163 note 1 It is not necessarily the exact form of the name as used in Phrygia early in the first millennium B.C., although the other divine names used in the Neo-Phrygian texts preserve the ancient forms. These texts even go out of their way to introduce the famous βεκς of Hdt. II. 2.

page 163 note 2 The ordinary prose words for the ‘tomb’ and ‘monument’ are κνουμαν and μανκα. The form διθρερα occurs in a verse inscription, and is probably ancient. Dithyrambos as a title points to *Dithreran-bas, ‘Lord of the Tomb’; cf. Lycabas, Korybas, etc.