No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 A Sinaitic MS. of the eleventh century, the reading of which I owe to the kindness of Mrs. Lewis and Mrs. Gibson of Cambridge.
2 I hold it probable that the assimilative zeal of the archetype of these codices did not quite extend to the restoration of ⋯ν⋯ρξατ∘ (as in OQ of Philo) for the tamer ἤρξατ∘. Hence the autograph of Philo most likely had ὃν ⋯ν⋯ρξατ∘ διαφερ⋯ντως ⋯ ∘ἰκε⋯α θεωρεἰν