^{page 280 note 1} The phonetic confusion between αι and ε seems to have begun in the second century B.C.; cf. Meisterhans–Schwyzer, 34; K.–B. i. 51 f.; Mayser, Gramm. i. 107 and the references in his n. 1; Schwyzer, i. 195.

^{page 280 note 2} See the commentary following the text in I.C. and Epigraphica, iv (1942), 177 ff.

^{page 280 note 3} For the -ωτος adjectives see Chantraine, Formation des noms, 305 f. and especially the list of -ωτος formations found in Buck-Petersen, Reverse Index, 524–9.

^{page 280 note 4} Cf. Bechtel, , Griech. Dial. ii. 721Google Scholar.

^{page 280 note 5} These compounds are attested from Homer (ἄμφωτως) onwards both in literature and in the inscriptions. For their origin see now Szemerényi, O. in Studi micenei e egeoanatolici, iii (1967), 47–88passim.Google Scholar

^{page 281 note 1} Cf. Greek, Etruscan and Roman Art in the Class. Collection of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston 1963, p. 70 no. 59 (Mus. No. 01. 7788).

^{page 281 note 2} B.S.A. xxv (1921–3), p. 53 pi. xi a–e.

^{page 281 note 3} B.S.A. xliii (1948), p. 105 pi. 23 No. 358. I am grateful to Professor Robertson for this reference and for the help that he has given me with this note.

^{page 281 note 4} A.M. lii (1927), p. 59 pl. xv, 30–3.

^{page 281 note 5} Hayes, J. Boardman–J., Excavations at Tocra 1963–5, i (1966), p. 146 No. 1503, pl. 93Google Scholar.

^{page 281 note 6} Protogeometric Pottery (Oxford, 1952), p. 241 pl. 34Google Scholar.

^{page 281 note 7} Boardman–Hayes, op. cit., pp. 79 f. no. 930, pl. 56; I owe this reference to Mr. Boardman.

^{page 281 note 8} Arch. Jahrbuch, xl (1925), 210 ffGoogle Scholar. To the evidence quoted add now the Rhodian tray illustrated and discussed by Johansen, Friis in Acta Archaeologica (Copenhagen), xxviii (1957), 139 ff. (Abb. 137).Google Scholar

^{page 281 note 9} hοκτώ in I.G. xiv. 645. i. 34; ἔξε in S.E.G. xiii. 394. 10; ⋯πτώ in Schwyzer D.G.E. 419. 4.

^{page 281 note 10} Cf. Jeffery, L. H., Morpurgo-Davies, A., Kadmos, ix (1970) forthcomingGoogle Scholar, where the evidence is discussed more thoroughly.