Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:25:15.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentationes Tullianae, de Ciceronis epistulis ad Brutum ad Quintum Fratrem ad Atticum Quaestiones - Comnientationes Tullianae, de Ciceronis epistulis ad Brutum ad Quintum Fratrem ad Atticum Quaestiones. By H. Sjögren. Two facsimiles. Pp. 1–167. Upsala: Almqvist et Wiksell, 1910.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 150 note 1 The Flores contain two quotations from the letters to Brutus, viz. f. 10 v. (Brut. i. 15. 9) vicit amentia levissimi hominis nostram prudentiam, and f. 25 v. (ib. i. I. 1) nichil enim minus hominis videtur quam non respondere in amore Mis a quibus provocare (sic). The second is said to come in quadam epla ad Brututn; the first is headed Cic. libro 3 epl. ad Brutum. Cf. Class. Rev. xx. (1906), p. 224, n. 4. I thought it well to verify the references not long ago when passing through Verona.

page 150 note 2 Sabbadini, Scoperte dei codici, p. 18.

page 150 note 3 The MS. was probably shown to Petrarch by Pastrengo. Cf. Voigt i. p. 207 n.

page 150 note 4 Sabbadini, Scoperte, p. 7, n. 23.

page 150 note 5 Leonardi Aretini, Epp. iii. 13, ed. Mehus.

page 150 note 6 Sabbadini, Scoperte, p. 74.

page 150 note 7 Die handschriflliche Überlieferung der Briefe Ciceronis, Leipzig, 1887Google Scholar; Der Briefwechsel des M. Tullius Cicero, Leipzig, 1893.Google Scholar

page 150 note 8 Gurlitt, L., Berl. Phil. Woch. xiv. (1894), p. 925.Google Scholar

page 150 note 9 Anecdota Oxoniensia x. (The velus Cluniacensis of Poggio), p. xvii sqq.

page 151 note 1 Sjögren speaks of Niccolo as ‘dives Florentinus,’ which seems odd. He was a poor man, except for the liberality of Cosimo de Medici, and at his death he owed 500 ducats to the bank of the Medici. Voigt (i. p. 305) happily calls him der arme Mäcen.

page 151 note 2 Anecdota Oxoniensia, x., p. xlviii.

page 151 note 3 The Codex Caprae appears to have resembled GH, i.e. the n division of Σ. It is tempting to suppose that the other division, Φ, may be connected with the MS. of Corvini.

page 151 note 4 Classical Review, xiii. (1899), p. 121. Asconius, ed. Oxon., pp. xxii-xxviii.Google Scholar

page 152 note 1 Cf. Schmidt, , Die handschriftliche Überlieferung, etc., p. 60.Google Scholar

page 154 note 1 Cf. Lehmann, p. 44.

page 154 note 2 He mentions (p. 4 n.) that, if Boot is to be trusted, in Att. iii. 8. 2 Rav. has ab Ilio. I find from my collation that it gives ab illo with the other MSS.