Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T08:33:41.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cicero Pro Balbo 54

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Erich S. Gruen
Erich S. Gruen
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1969 , pp. 8 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 8 note 2 For the lex Servilia as Glaucia's law see, for example, Passerini, A., Athenaeum, xii (1954), 129–130Google Scholar; Tibiletti, G., Athenaeum, xxxi (1953), 74Google Scholar; Schönbauer, E., Jura, vii (1956), 102–104Google Scholar; as Caepio's law, see Luzzatto, G., Arch. Stor. Pugliese, iv (1951), 35–38Google Scholar; Badian, E., C.R. lxviii (1954), 101–112Google Scholar; Nicolet, C., L'ordre équestre à l'époque républicaine (Paris, 1966), 535–536.Google Scholar

page 8 note 3 C.R. lxxxi (1967), 256–258.Google Scholar

page 10 note 1 Cic. apud Asc. 67, Clark; also Schol. Bob. 129, Stangl.

page 10 note 2 Sources in Broughton, , M.R.R. ii. 11Google Scholar; see Husband, R. W., C.P. xi (1916), 321–323Google Scholar; Gabba, E., Athenaeum, xxxi (1953), 260–262.Google Scholar

page 10 note 3 Cic. Inv. ii. 134: indignum est de lege aliquid derogari, aut legem abrogari aut aliqua ex parte commutari; Rep. iii. 33: neque derogari ex hac aliquid licet, neque tota abrogari potest; Digest, 50. 16. 102: derogatur legi, cum pars detrahitur; abrogatur legi, cum prorsus tollitur; Paul. ap. Fest. 61 L.: derogare proprie est, cum quid ex lege vetere, qua minus fiat, sancitur lege nova; derogare ergo detrahere est.

page 10 note 4 Cic. Att. iii. 23. 3; Rep. iii. 33; Ad Herenn. ii. 10. 15.

page 10 note 5 Cf. also, in this same sense, Suet. Claud. 23: capiti Papiae Poppaeae legis a Tiberio … addito abrogavit.

page 10 note 6 It must be noted, however, that the author of the Ad Herennium does envisage the possibility of two separate enactments which are mutually incongruous; ii. 10. 15: cum duae leges inter se discrepant, videndum est primum, num qua obrogatio aut derogatio est.

page 10 note 7 So, rightly, Badian, , C.R. lxviii (1954), 101–102.Google Scholar

page 11 note 1 Cic. Inv. i. 92: offensum est quod eorum qui audiunt voluntatem laedit; ut si quis apud equites Romanos cupidos iudicandi Caepionis legem iudiciariam laudet; De Or. ii. 199: equitum Romanorum, apud quos tum indues causa agebatur, ad Q. Caepionis odium, a quo erant ipsi propter iudicia abalienati, renovabam; Brut. 164: invidia concitatur in iudicum et in accusatorum factionem; cf. Clu. 140, De Or. i. 225.

page 11 note 2 Professor Badian has kindly offered suggestions for this note. He is not to be held responsible for its contents.