^{page 10 note 1} Select Letters, ii. 268; cf. p. 168.

^{page 10 note 2} History of Rome (tr. Dickson, Everyman's Library), iv. 322.

^{page 10 note 3} Roman Republic, ii. 243—4.

^{page 10 note 4} Grandezza e Decadenza di Roma, ii. 242—3.

^{page 10 note 5} Roman Republic, iii. 261.

^{page 10 note 6} Caesars Monarchic und das Principal des Pompejus, 255.

^{page 10 note 7} C.A.H. ix. 630—1.

^{page 10 note 8} Correspondence of Cicero, iii. 116.

^{page 10 note 9} App. Bell. Civ. ii. 4. 30; How, p. 173; Adcock in C.A.H. ix. 635.

^{page 10 note 10} Cf., for example, Ter. Ad. 638, 642.

^{page 10 note 11} And so Adcock, op. cit. 631.

^{page 11 note 1} For this date Adcock, Cf., ‘The Legal Term of Caesar's Governorship in Gaul’, C.Q. 26 (1923),14—26.Google Scholar

^{page 11 note 2} How (pp. 263, 313, 315 n.) follows Hirschfeld and others in saying that it was ‘clearly’ illegal to begin discussion of the appointment of Caesar's successor before 1 March 50 B.C.; but see C.A.H. ix. 629, n. 2, and C.Q., loc. cit. 21.