^{page 264 note 1} Brugmann, Grundriss, ii. 2, 738.

^{page 264 note 2} I am not here concerned with line 454. But of intactus I will say thus much. Lachmann's rule needs a slight modification. It will be absolute if stated in this form: Verbal nouns with n- privative prefix are not found in Latin save in the ablative case or in an equivalent adverbial construction. Thus, we may say iniussu senates fiebat, but not iniussus senatus efficiebat: ber incultum imminuebatur, but not incultus imminuebat.

^{page 265 note 1} diēī is found in the Vir Bonus (15) and the Est et Non (20).