^{page 156 note 1} The editor however is preceded by Bonitz (A.S.J. 76) in some important points here.

^{page 157 note 1} Reference may also be permitted to an article in the Transactions of the Oxford Philological Society 1889–90, ‘On some apparent anomalies in the use of μ,’ paragraph 6 fin.

^{page 158 note 1} If however Athenagoras had argued as in the text there would be every reason to suppose that the clause was a late gloss, and that ὅπερ Ἀθηναγρας should be read in it. In his extant writings however there is nothing which sufficiently corresponds. The following passage from his Legatio pro Christianis seems to be the only one which is even remotely related to the subject, and it clearly could not be described by the clause in the text: Clarendon Press edition, 1682, p. 30, Paul's edition, 1856, ch. vii., init.—

^{page 160 note 1} The fifth is in full as follows:—.