Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T15:52:01.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Unnoticed fragment of Sappho?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

Robert Browning
Robert Browning
Affiliation:
University College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , December 1960 , pp. 192 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 192 note 1 I am very grateful to Professor Daube, who saw an early draft of this note and made valuable suggestions.

page 192 note 2 Michael Italicus cannot be ruled out. He Probably owed his appointment as Metropolitan of Philippolis to Michael II, and would therefore still be in Constantinople at this time.

page 193 note 1 I would hazard the conjecture ἔψεξαν.

page 193 note 2 If Maas's dating of Gregory in the tenth or eleventh century (Byz.-neugr. Jahrb. ii [1921], 53–55) is accepted, then the fuller version of the commentary, printed by Walz in Rh. Gr. vii, cannot be by him, as it contains several references to John Tzetzes. There is room for further work on the commentaries on the Περ μεθδον δειντητος, which are particularly rich in quotations. Cf. H. Rabe, ‘Aus Rhetoren-Handschriften’, Rh. M. lxiii (1912), 127–51.