Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:08:59.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of the Singular Nos by Horace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Elsie Hancock
Elsie Hancock
Affiliation:
Cardiff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The object of this paper is to enquire how far we can trace in the works of Horace the use of the plural forms of the first person which have been pointed out by Professor R. S. Conway in his essay on The Use of the Singular nos in Cicero's Letters (Camb. Phil. Soc. Proc., Vol. V., Part I., 1899), from which it appeared that the idiom throws valuable light upon the inner workings of Cicero's mind.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1925 , pp. 43 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 43 note 1 With regard to the counting of examples I have followed Dr. Conway. ‘Phrases like ego hoc facio are each counted as only one example of ego, nos tacemus as only one example of nos, but dico me hoc fecisse or meos curabo as two of ego, and so on. This is necessary in view of the examples of ego and nos side by side. But two co-ordinate verbs are counted as only one example if they are close together (e.g. oro et obsecro), but as two if they are separated by a pause in the sense or by an intervening phrase.’

page 45 note 1 Stephanus, Lambinus, Bentley, Kirchner, Ritter, Dillenburger, Orelli.

page 45 note 2 Franke, Michaelis, Nettleship.