No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Faced with the many and grave difficulties of 1.565 Coulon in his Budé edition excises it, putting a colon at the end of 1. 564 and taking 
as absolute: ‘déplorent leur pauvreté et y ajoutent’. In this he follows Herwerden and Willems, and defends his action (Essai sur la methode de la critique, p. 169)
page 53 note 1 Goodwin's statement (M. and T., § 648) that ‘
sometimes takes the subjunctive without 
, even in Attic Greek’ (which might justify 
with the subjunctive without 
) is not true of Aristophanes. Hecites Ran. 1281 
which Elmsley long ago corrected to 
, and Eccl. 629, where the same scholar corrected the unmetrical rats 
page 54 note 1 Except the foolish suggestion of Richards, H. (Aristophanes and others, p. 31), ‘trying to make them equal to my blessings’.Google Scholar