^{page 105 note 1} I base my lists and citations throughout on the edition of Klotz.

^{page 105 note 2} Wotke, C. (Eranos Vindobonensis, 1893, pp. 211–17)Google Scholarsuggested this from his knowledge of Book I only.

^{page 105 note 3} Notices et extraits des manuscrits de la Bibliothèque Nationale, 31, i (1884), PP. 280–2 and p. 356Google Scholar; Notice sur Us manuscrits disparus de Tours, pp. 124–6 and p. 200. See also Wilkins, A. (C.R. xiii, 1889, p. 65)Google Scholar.

^{page 105 note 4} T is No. 24 in A Catalogue of the MSS. at Ashburnham Place. Part I, comprising a collection formed by Professor Libri (London, 1845?)Google Scholar.

^{page 105 note 5} I am indebted to M. Porcher of the Bibliothèque Nationale and to M. Collon of the library at Tours for the resolution of queries in this connexion.

^{page 105 note 6} Papiers de Bréquigny, xxxv, fol. 100, preserved in the Bibliotheque Nationale.

^{page 105 note 7} Williams, R. D. (C.R. 1ri, 1947, pp. 88–90)Google Scholar.

^{page 107 note 1} The readings of the original hand of T in this. list go back to the common ancestor of T and r, for they are also the readings of the original hand of r (except only these minor differences:

^{page 108 note 1} Catalogue of Western Manuscripts in the Old Royal and King's Collections in the British Museum, vol. ii.

^{page 108 note 2} I have attempted to discover the source of these remarkable errors, and I find that many of them have arisen from a misunderstanding or misreading of Bentley's collation. Bentley himself is rarely in error, and Kinkel's collation of Books I–VI is very accurate.

^{page 108 note 3} See Getty, op. cit., pp. 131–3, for corrections to Klotz's citations of S.

^{page 109 note 1} In the list which follows, the readings which I indicate as r ¹ are also those of T ¹, with the two very minor exceptions of iv. 732

and vi. 674

^{page 110 note 1} The arguments of Klotz about the correcting hand of r (Rhein. Mtts. lix, 1904, p. 383 f.) are not valid, as he confuses variants written by the scribe with later corrections or variants. In fact only r ^T has that affinity with the later manuscripts which he attributes to the corrector of r: r ² is related to the ω group (especially to D), and r¹ of course also to the ω group.

^{page 110 note 2} See also the list of readings of T above.

^{page 111 note 1} See also Klotz, , Praefatio, p. liiiGoogle Scholar.

^{page 111 note 2} See also Klotz, , Praefatio, p. livGoogle Scholar.