^{page 105 note 2} Translated by Oldfather, C. H. (Loeb Classical Library, 1954).Google Scholar

^{page 105 note 3} Mentioned by Judeich, , Kleinasiatische Studien (Marburg, 1892), pp. 190 and 264Google Scholar; Beloch, , Griechische Geschichte III. i. 99Google Scholar; Swoboda, , R.-E. s.v. Glos (2), col. 1432Google Scholar; Hill, , History of Cyprus i. 139.Google Scholar Beloch is the exception; his comments are discussed later in the article.

^{page 105 note 4} III. ii. 226 ff.; Judeich, , locc. citt., while admitting that the Cypriot War went on until 380, keeps Diodorus' date (384) and has to make Glos' rising follow a temporary cessation of hostilities, which broke out again after his death.Google Scholar

^{page 106 note 1} Cf. Barber, G. L., The Historian Ephorus (Cambridge, 1935), p. 39.Google Scholar

^{page 106 note 2} On Diodorus' method, cf. Schwartz, , R.-E. s.v. Ephoros, col. 10Google Scholar; also Hammond, , C.Q. xxxi (1937), 84Google Scholar, and Gomme, , A Historical Commentary on Thucydides (Oxford, 1945), i. 52.Google Scholar

^{page 106 note 3} III. i. 99.

^{page 106 note 4} Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 4. 25–34.Google Scholar

^{page 106 note 5} Id., Agesilaus I. 36; Plutarch, , Agesilaus 15. 1.Google Scholar

^{page 107 note 1} Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 3. 27Google Scholar; Diodorus, 15. 23. 3–5.Google Scholar

^{page 107 note 2} Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 2. 7 (Mantinea), 5. 2. 32–36 (Thebes), 5. 3. 10–13 (Phlius), 5. 3. 18–19 (Olynthus)Google Scholar; cf. Isocrates, ' summary in Panegyricus 126.Google Scholar

^{page 107 note 3} Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 3. 21–25.Google Scholar

^{page 107 note 4} ibid. 5. 3. 26, cf. 2. 2. 20.

^{page 107 note 5} Cf. Smith, R. E., ‘The Opposition to Agesilaus' Foreign Policy’ (Historia ii [1953–1954], 274), whose silence on the settlements with Phlius and Olynthus (see p. 280) suggests that he does not connect them with the opposition.Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 1} 15. 20. 2; cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 23. 3.Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 2} Cf. Hudson-Williams, H. Ll., ‘Isocrates and Recitations’, C.Q. xliii (1949), 65 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 3} For the anti-Spartan purpose cf. esp. lines 9–11 of Aristoteles' Decree (I.G. ii ². 43Google Scholar = Tod no. 123); for its popularity, cf. the list of allies in lines 79 ff.

^{page 108 note 4} Athenian reluctance, Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 4. 19; final decision, 5. 4. 34.Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 5} ibid. 1. 3. 1–2.

^{page 108 note 6} ibid. 3. 4. 4 (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 6. 6).Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 7} Xenophon, , Hellenica 3. 5. 5.Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 8} ibid. 5. 1. 32–33 (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 23. 3).Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 9} Xenophon, , Hellenica 5. 2. 32Google Scholar (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 23. 4).Google Scholar

^{page 108 note 10} Xenophon, , Hellenica 6. 3. 19–20Google Scholar (cf. Plutarch, , Agesilaus 28).Google Scholar

^{page 109 note 1} Cf. Diodorus 14. 110. 4 and 15. 19. 4, and Lysias' Olympic Oration (actually delivered at Olympia), which, in the view of the present author, belongs to 384.

^{page 109 note 2} I.G. ii ². 43 (= Tod no. 123), lines 17–18.Google Scholar

^{page 109 note 3} Diodorus 15. 18. 1.