Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:31:50.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sophocles, Oedipus Coloneus 174–5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. A. J. M. Buijs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 463 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On these rules cf. Korzeniewski, D., Griechische Metrik (Darmstadt, 1968), p. 91;Google Scholar E. Lefevre, WS 72 (1959), 108–12; L. P. E. Parker, CQ n.s. 8 (1958), 82–9; D. S. Raven, AJPh 86 (1965), 234–6; Snell, B., Griechische Metrik (Göttingen, 1962), p. 25;Google ScholarWifstrand, A., Hermes 69 (1934), 210–14. The metrical notation of this paper follows Maas and Snell, butGoogle Scholar

2 But cf. κα⋯ before the break, A. Pers. 47; οὐ S. Tr. 991, Ph. 196, E. HF 449; ὅπως S. El. 98; ως S. Ph. 162.

3 S. Ant. 113 the catalexis in some editions is due to conjecture.

4 S. OC 188, hiatus without change of speaker, but with rhetorical pause, should not be emended. The same may be true of A. Pers. 18, but there is no justification for the phenomenon in S. Aj. 169. A. Ag. 794 f. has a lacuna. A. Ag. 1537 ἰὠ λ*** λ*** is exclamatory, therefore no example, since hiatus after exclamations is admissible everywhere. E. Hipp. 1377, Hec. 83, Ion 167, IT 125, 147, 231 are sung. Cf. this catalogue with Korzeniewski, p. 89. E. Or. 1302, Fr. 773. 68, and perhaps Supp. 277 are comparable dactylic examples.

5 S. Ph. 161 ἄπεστι QR is therefore metrically possible.

6 Fraenkel's reservation, RhM 72 (1917/18), 186 n. 1, seems not justified in view of the anapaestic parallels.

7 S. El. 88 f., 105 f., E. Ion 859–61 are by no means comparable, as those long anapaestic passages are not interrupted by lyrics.

8 cf. Wilamowitz, Griechische Verskunst, p. 348 n. 2.