No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
page 50 note 1 κρισ(σ)αγ⋯ν for Κρισ(σ)αɭων (so Cas.) at Apoll, 446 is not necessarily ‘a case of Romaic influence’ (Allen); Γ˜| occurs e.g. at Bacch. 12, 95.
page 51 note 1 And there it is in arsi, ούκέτι ρμμϕα.
page 51 note 2 Milne, C.R. 1922. 66Google Scholar.
page 51 note 3 Without Πρόϕρονες the singular might perhaps just stand, on the supposition that the poet was thinking more of αύτή and less of notify, as κούρη, as if he had written σύν κούρη.