No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Simplex Ordo1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
As a student at Cambridge forty years ago I received a good training in the language and literature of classical Greece, and had the good fortune to study paleography under the late E. H. Minns. For all this I am deeply grateful. But I had no training in Byzantine Greek. It was only later, and more or less by accident, that I discovered Byzantine and Modern Greek. It is not my intention to discuss the wider aspects of this question now, but to appeal, on the basis of some passages in the Oresteia, for a new approach to textual criticism, or rather for the renewal of an old approach.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1965
References
2 Headlam, W., ‘The Transposition of Words in MSS’, CR xvi (1902), 243.Google Scholar
3 Cobet, C. G., Variae Lectiones, p. 475.Google Scholar
4 Headlam, , On Editing Aeschylus (1891), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
1 Headlam, , C.R. xvi. 247.Google Scholar
2 Paley, F. A., The Tragedies of Aeschylus (1861), p. xxx.Google Scholar
1 Thomson, G., The Oresteia of Aeschylus (1938), i. 74–93.Google Scholar
1 Porson, R., Euripides, p. 7.Google Scholar
2 Cobet, , Collectanea Critica, p. 188.Google Scholar
3 Headlam, , C.R. xvi. 243.Google Scholar
1 The case for 
has been argued by Beattie, A. R., who writes (C.R. N.S. ii [:1952] 71): ‘The corruption 
which is a hap. leg., would easily arise from the the context’. How?Google Scholar
1 Cf. also ch. 302–4 
