No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Signor Ferrero or Caesar?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
Signor Ferrero has courteously replied to the article in the Classical Quarterly of July, 1909, in which I gave reasons for preferring Caesar's First Commentary to his reconstruction. He thinks that I failed to seize his main point, which, he says, is represented by this question: Why did Caesar conclude an alliance with Ariovistus in 59 b.c. and break it in the following year? Any one who may have read my article with care will have seen that I recognized that this point was capital.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1910
References
page 239 note 1 C. Q., 1910, p. 28.
page 239 note 2 Ed. 1899, p. 21.
page 239 note 3 C. Q., 1909, p. 213.
page 239 note 4 C. Q., 1910, p. 28.
page 240 note 1 B. G., i, 20, § 4.
page 240 note 2 C. Q. 1910, p. 29.
page 240 note 3 As I remarked in my former article (C. Q., 1909, p. 211), Caesar did exactly what the philo Roman party wanted, —first expelled the Helvetii, and then Ariovistus.
page 240 note 4 B. G., i, 18, § 9.
page 241 note 1 C. Q., 1910, p. 29.
page 241 note 2 Dion Cassius, xl, 56.
page 241 note 3 Röm. Gesch., iii, 1889, p. 615 (Eng. trans., v, 1894, p. 499).
page 242 note 1 C. Q., 1910, p. 30.
page 242 note 2 Ib., p. 31.
page 242 note 3 The Greatness and Decline of Rome, ii, 345–6.
page 242 note 4 C. Q., 1909, p. 209.
page 243 note 1 C. Q., 1910, p. 31.
page 243 note 2 Ib., p. 33.
page 243 note 3 Ib., p. 32. I have explained in Caesar's Conquest of Gaul, pp. 30, 199–200, why the Helvetii, in order to reach Saintonge, marched through Aeduan territory.
page 244 note 1 C. Q., 1910, p. 32.
page 244 note 2 Ib.
page 244 note 3 B. G., i, 5, § 1.
page 244 note 4 C. Q., 1910, pp. 32–3.
page 245 note 1 What I said was that ‘such a host could not have settled anywhere in Gaul without conquest, and of course they intended to conquer all they could.’ C. Q., 1909, p. 208, n. 2.
page 245 note 2 C. Q., 1910, p. 33.
page 245 note 3 The Greatness and Decline of Rome, ii, 344. Cf. Heitland, W. E., The Roman Republic, 1909, § 1153Google Scholar
page 245 note 4 Cf. B. G., i, 15 with i, 18, § 10.
page 246 note 1 C. Q., 1910, p. 33.