Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:34:15.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SENECA, DE BENEFICIIS 6.19.5—A NEGLECTED TEXT ON ROMAN PUBLIC LAW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2019

Miriam Griffin  and
Andrew Lintott
Miriam Griffin
Affiliation:
Somerville College, Oxford
Andrew Lintott*
Affiliation:
Worcester College, Oxford
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

si quis patriae meae pecuniam credat, non dicam me illius debitorem nec hoc aes alienum profitebor aut candidatus aut reus: ad exsoluendum tamen hoc dabo portionem meam.

If anyone were to lend money to my country, I will not call myself his debtor nor will I declare this as money owed either when a candidate or when prosecuted: nevertheless, I will contribute my share to paying off the debt.

Miriam Griffin drew attention to the comment of Justus Lipsius: ‘a defendant might have to make such a declaration in cases involving financial penalties, such as extortion and peculation, for when the litis aestimatio [‘assessment of damages’] was made, it would be important to know who the other claimants to the convicted man's assets were, and how encumbered his property was.’ No further elucidation, however, has been made since Lipsius. Mommsen failed to record this passage in his Staatsrecht and Strafrecht, and, as far as we know, no monograph on Roman criminal law mentions the passage of Seneca.

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , December 2018 , pp. 731 - 733
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Griffin, M.T., Seneca on Society. A Guide to De Beneficiis (Oxford, 2013), 299–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Lipsius, J., L. Annaei Senecae Opera (Antwerp, 1652 4), 353Google Scholar.

3 Basore, J.W., Seneca: Moral Essays III (Cambridge, Mass., 1935), 402Google Scholar.

4 See Griffin, M., ‘Latin philosophy and Roman law’, in Harte, V. and Lane, M. (edd.), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy (Cambridge, 2013), 96–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar with references to earlier literature.

5 Eck, W., ‘Die lex Troesmensium: ein Stadtgesetz für ein municipium ciuium Romanorum’, ZPE 200 (2016), 565–606Google Scholar, B.1–3. Eck emended minores sint to minorue res sit in this passage: (K. XVII) [dum ne rationem habeat eius quoi ipsei, cum] petet, patri auoue paterno proauoue paterni | aui patri cuius in potestate sit, mino<rue> res si{n}t quam | ut eum adlegendum numero dec(urionum) conscriptorumue esse | inue eum numerum legi oporteat. ‘(Ch. XVII) [provided that he does not accept as candidate the man who, at the time of his] candidature, is subject to the power of his father, or paternal grandfather, or great grandfather, father of the paternal grandfather, or has less property than is required for him to be fit to be added to the number of the local senators or those enrolled or elected to that number’ (our translation).

6 Lintott, A., ‘M. Caelius Rufus and Pausanias’, CQ 30 (1980), 385–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See Lintott, A., Judicial Reform and Land Reform in the Roman Republic (Cambridge, 1992), 28Google Scholar.