^{page 138 note1} Schnur, Werner, Klio, XX., 1926, pp. 297, 301Google Scholar , quoting a document from Sethe's Urkunden; see also Bouché-Leclercq, A., Histoire des Lagides, IV., P. 5Google Scholar, n. 2. Schnur makes Nakhtenebef Nectanebo II. (p. 274, n. 1).

^{page 138 note 2} Weber, W., Die ägyptisch-griechischen Terra-kotten, I., 1914, pp. 112Google Scholar sq. He says: ‘Das kann kaum etwas anderes bedeuten, also dasser [Ptolemy I.] ihr rechtmassigen Nachfolger und als freier, legitimer Pharao angesehen zu werden gewünscht hat’.

^{page 138 note 3} Sethe, K., Hieroglvphisohe Urkunden der griech.röm. Zeit, p. 27, no. 12. Mr. S. R. K. Glanville kindly made me a note of its contents. It is referred to by Bouche-Leclercq, III., p. 88, n. I; see note 1, page 2, post.Google Scholar

^{page 138 note 4} See the list of the illegitimate cbildren of Ptolemy I. in Bouché-Leclercq, I., p. 26, n. 4.

^{page 138 note 5} On this phase see Kornemann, E., Raccolta Lumbroso, p. 235Google Scholar. Bevan, E., A History of Egypt under the Ptolemaic Dynasty, p. 53Google Scholar, rather wonders why Ptolemy, in imitation of Alexander, did not marry a native princess. I think that he did.

^{page 139 note 1} Bouché-Leclercq, III., p. 88, n. I, at first suspected that Ptolemais might have been a wife of Ptolemy I., but finally inclined to believe that she was merely Arsinoe II.

^{page 139 note2} The unmarried Ptolemaic princesses were called Βaóiλώa: O.G.I.S. 35.

^{page 139 note 3} Miletus' decree for Apama: RevHclleaux, M.,. Ét. Gr. XXXVI., 1923, p. 1.Google Scholar

The case of Ptolemy II. is a generation later; also his consort, being a goddess, was not officially dead.

^{page 139 note 5} Jos, . Ant. XI. 54Google Scholar ; 1 Esdras 4, 29. The wholestory has strong resemblances to Pseudo-Aristeas. A curious attempt, which I need not consider, has been made to prove this Apama historical and shift her to the reign of Darius III.: Torrey, C. C., Amer. Journ. of Semitic Languages, XXIII., 1906–1907, p. 177Google Scholar .

^{page 139 note 6} Plut. Eum. 1.

^{page 140 note 1} Arr, . Anab. VII. 4, 6Google Scholar ; undoubtedly from the Journal through Ptolemy.

^{page 140 note 2} J.H.S. XLI., 1921, p. 26Google Scholar and n. 21.

^{page 140 note 3} Hermippus, , fr. 72 (F.H.G. III., p. 51)Google Scholar ; Strab. XII. 563. Nothing is known of her but the name.

^{page 140 note 4} Plut, . Artax. 27Google Scholar.

^{page 140 note 5} O.G.I.S. 223, 1. 24; 220, 1. 20. Dittenberger's notes show how hopeless the difficulty has been.

^{page 140 note 6} Arrian, , Parthica, fr. I (F.H.G. III., p. 587)Google Scholar.

^{page 141 note 7} Diod. XXXI. 19.

^{page 141 note 8} App. Syr. 13; Livy, XXXV, 47, 5.

^{page 141 note 1} O.G.I.S. 388 to 401.

^{page 141 note 2} Ib. 399, 400.

^{page 141 note 3} J.H.S. XLI., 1921, p. 18Google Scholar . See Wilamowitz, , Helknistiche Dichtung, II., p. 146Google Scholar, n. 2, who accepts my view.

^{page 141 note 4} I gave some instances, J.H.S. XLI., 1921, p. 27Google Scholar .

^{page 141 note 5} Kornemann op. cit.