Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:32:41.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Octavian and Orestes in Pausanias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Natale Cecioni
Affiliation:
Rome

Extract

M. J. Dewar argues that in Georg. 1.511–4 Virgil may have been drawing a disquieting parallel between Orestes, evoked through an imitation of Aeschylus (‘Choeph.’ 1021–5), and Octavian, present a few lines above (498ff.).

Pausanias probably supports this suggestion; he shows that the link Octavian-Orestes existed quite early and in a sense favourable to Octavian, even though it may soon have been used in a negative sense by anti-Caesarian propaganda on account of the dark side of the myth. In front of the temple of Hera in Argos there was still visible in the second century a statue representing Orestes, but identified by the inscription as Augustus. Certainly this parallel Augustus-Orestes was not proposed-and preserved - with polemical purpose in a famous sanctuary and in the Augustan age. Given the resemblance between history and myth and the moral weight of the famous myth itself, it is unlikely that we have to do with the mere re-use of any old statue.

Type
Shorter Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Octavian and Orestes in the Finale of the First Georgic’, CQ 38 (1988), 563–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Octavian and Orestes again’, CQ 40 (1990), 580–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Paus. 2, 17, 3; see Frazer's commentary (1898) ad loc. and 1, 18, 3 about reconversions of ancient statues in favour of living personalities.