Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:51:38.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on Plutarch's De Genio Socratis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

D. A. Russell
Affiliation:
St. John's College, Oxford

Extract

(1) 583 b = p. 478. 26 Sieveking (Plutarchi Moralia, iii, Leipzig, 1929)

is objectionable. Since Lysis is already dead, cannot here signify ‘beforehand’. Its only other appropriate significance would seem to be ‘publicly, openly’: but also enters into the compound, and can only bear the sense ‘secretly’, which would involve us in a contradiction. so far as I know, does not occur elsewhere: nearly always has the sense ‘give some indication of…’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 62 note 1 I assume that they are independent witnesses, despite Manton, , C.Q. xlii (1949), 97 ff.Google Scholar: see Hubert, , Rh. Mus. xciii (1950), 330 ff.Google Scholar But Flaceliére, R. (Plutarque: Dialogue sur l'Amour, 1952, pp. 34 ff.Google Scholar) strongly supports Manton with new arguments.

page 62 note 2 Corruptions often occur in the immediate neighbourhood of lacunae: the wrong here may therefore be thought to afford confirmation of the suggestion that the lacuna was very close to it.

page 63 note 1 His point comes from Plato, Symp. 203 a: (sc.)