^{page 182 note 1} De har. resp. 48. Cf. Pro Sest. 67–68.

^{page 182 note 2} Att. III. 8. 3.

^{page 182 note 3} Pro Sest. 67, etc.

^{page 182 note 4} De har. resp. 48–49, ‘longius processit; in ipsum Cn. Pompeium … inuehi coepit,’ et seq.

^{page 182 note 5} Ascon. 47 (ed. Orelli).

^{page 182 note 6} De domo 40, ‘Tu tuo praecipitante iam et debilitato tribunatu auspiciorum patronus subito exstitisti.’

^{page 182 note 7} Ib. ‘quod si fieret,’ etc.

^{page 182 note 8} De har. resp. 48.

^{page 182 note 9} Ib. 48–49.

^{page 182 note 10} Whose particular policy it had been to attack the auspices. Cf. In Vat. 14–15; Pro Sest. 33, etc.

^{page 182 note 11} Cf. Att. II. 9. 1, ‘qui omnia remedia reipublicae effuderunt, etc.’

^{page 182 note 12} Cf. Pro Sest. 33, etc.

^{page 182 note 13} Att. III. 8. 3.

^{page 182 note 14} Ib. Ascon. 47.

^{page 182 note 15} Pro Sest. 67, etc.

^{page 182 note 16} Cf. Pro Sest. 71; Att. III. 18. 1.

^{page 182 note 17} Cf. Ad fam. I. 9. 14; De prou. cons. 25.

^{page 182 note 18} Cf. De domo 40, ‘praecipitante iam et debilitato tribunatu.’ De har. resp. 50, ‘cuius initia furoris dissensionibus eorem qui turn a uobis seiuncti uidebantur sustentata sunt. Reliqua iam praccipitantis tribunatus … obtrectatores eorum atque aduersarii defenderunt.’ Cf. also Heitland, Vol. III., pp. 173–174; De domo 34–39; De prou. cons. 45–46; Dio 3g. 21.

^{page 183 note 1} De domo 40.

^{page 183 note 2} Cf. De har. resp. 50; vide n. 18, supra.

^{page 183 note 3} De domo 40.

^{page 183 note 4} The Senate might exercise its discretion in such a case. Cf. Willems, , Droit public romain, p. 155Google Scholar; Cic. De leg. II. 12, 31.

^{page 183 note 5} De har. resp. 48.

^{page 183 note 6} Ib., ‘Ferebant in oculis hominem quidam boni uiri … inibat gratiam a nonnullis.’ Cf. ib. 50.

^{page 183 note 7} ‘Become a good Optimate and restore the father of his fatherland on his own shoulders’ (De domo 40). Cicero's suggestion that he did not realize that his own position was involved (De har. resp. 48, ‘quam caecus amentia non uidebat’) need not be taken seriously.

^{page 183 note 8} The question of the agrarian laws and the ‘donations’ of the eastern kingdoms (cf. Fam. I. 9. 7, and Att. II. 9. 1).

^{page 183 note 9} Cf. Pro Sest. 73. His measure against Cicero was subsequently attacked on fresh grounds: ‘etiamsi iure esset rogatum, tamen uim habere non posset.’

^{page 183 note 10} Cf. De har. resp. 48, ‘Ferebant in oculis quidam boni uiri,’ et sqq. Ib. 50, ‘Volo’ in quiunt ‘esse qui in contione detrahat de Pompeio.’ Cf. Q. jr. II. 2. 2 and 3, where Bibuius, Favonius, Curio, and Servilius join him again in attacks on Pompey.

^{page 183 note 11} De har. resp. 42.

^{page 183 note 12} Att. II. 12. 2.

^{page 183 note 13} Ib.

^{page 183 note 14} Correspondence of Cicero, ad loc.

^{page 183 note 15} De domo 65, ‘quasi per beneficium.’ Cf. Dio 39. 22.

^{page 183 note 16} De domo 22, 65; Pro Sest. 60.

^{page 183 note 17} De domo 22; Pro Sest. 60.

^{page 183 note 18} Cf. Pro Sest. 60, ‘splendorem maculare’.

^{page 184 note 1} Cf. Dio 39. 23. 3.

^{page 184 note 2} De domo 22.

^{page 184 note 3} Dio 39. 23. 4.

^{page 184 note 4} Cf. In Vat. 41.

^{page 184 note 5} Cf. In Vat. 13, 15, 38; Pro Sest. 132, 135.

^{page 184 note 6} See C.Q., April, 1924.

^{page 184 note 7} Dio 39. 23. 4.

^{page 184 note 8} Att. III. 8. The first of Cicero's letters which refers to the Tigranes' episode also contains the news that Varro and Hypsaeus, friends of Pompey, had been active on his behalf.

^{page 184 note 9} Cf. Pro Sest. 69; De domo 67; De har. resp. 49; Ascon. 47.

^{page 184 note 10} Cf. Di har. resp. 48, 50, etc.

^{page 184 note 11} Q. fr. II. 3. 2 and 3; C.Q., April, 1924.

^{page 184 note 12} Pro Sest.71.

^{page 184 note 13} Ib. 72, 73.

^{page 184 note 14} Ib. 74.